Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

American Chemical Society, Inorganic Chemistry, 18(53), p. 9907-9916, 2014

DOI: 10.1021/ic501574e

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

When the tolman electronic parameter fails: A comparative DFT and charge displacement study of [(L)Ni(CO)3]0/- and [(L)Au(CO)]0/+

This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.
This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
  • Must obtain written permission from Editor
  • Must not violate ACS ethical Guidelines
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
  • Must obtain written permission from Editor
  • Must not violate ACS ethical Guidelines
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

In this study we have examined 42 [(L)M- (CO)n]±/0 complexes (M = Ni and Au), including neutral ligands, such as phosphines and carbenes, and anionic ones. For each complex, the carbonyl stretching frequency (νCO) and the amount of charge donated from the ligand to the metal (CT) have been computed on the basis of DFT calculations. For nickel complexes, the two observables nicely correlate with each other, as expected from the theory underlying the Tolman electronic parameter. On the contrary, for gold complexes a more complex pattern can be observed, with an apparent differentiation between phosphine ligands and carbon-based ones. Such differences have been explained analyzing the Au-L bond in terms of Dewar-Chatt-Duncanson bonding constituents (σ donation and π back-donation). Our analysis demonstrates that in linear gold(I) complexes, νCO depends only on the metal-to-ligand π back-donation.