Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

American Chemical Society, Inorganic Chemistry, 16(53), p. 8257-8269, 2014

DOI: 10.1021/ic5005177

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Relation between the Catalytic Efficiency of the Synthetic Analogues of Catechol Oxidase with Their Electrochemical Property in the Free State and Substrate-Bound State

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
  • Must obtain written permission from Editor
  • Must not violate ACS ethical Guidelines
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
  • Must obtain written permission from Editor
  • Must not violate ACS ethical Guidelines
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

A library of 15 dicopper complexes as synthetic analogues of catechol oxidase has been synthesized with the aim to determine the relationship between the electrochemical behavior of the dicopper(II) species in the absence as well as in the presence of 3,5-di-tert-butylcatechol (3,5-DTBC) as model substrate and the catalytic activity, kcat, in DMSO medium. The complexes have been characterized by routine physicochemical techniques as well as by X-ray single-crystal structure analysis in some cases. Fifteen “end-off” compartmental ligands have been designed as 1 + 2 Schiff-base condensation product of 2,6-diformyl-4-R-phenol (R = Me, tBu, and Cl) and five different amines, N-(2-aminoethyl)- piperazine, N-(2-aminoethyl)pyrrolidine, N-(2-aminoethyl)- morpholine, N-(3-aminopropyl)morpholine, and N-(2-aminoethyl)piperidine