Published in

Wiley, Plant Biology, 5(18), p. 785-796, 2016

DOI: 10.1111/plb.12461

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Impact of interspecific competition and drought on the allocation of new assimilates in trees

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

In trees, the interplay between reduced carbon assimilation and the inability to transport carbohydrates to the sites of demand under drought might be one of the mechanisms leading to carbon starvation. However, we largely lack knowledge on how drought effects on new assimilate allocation differ between species with different drought sensitivities and how these effects are modified by inter-specific competition. We thus assessed the fate of (13) C labelled assimilates in above- and belowground plant organs and in root/rhizosphere respired CO2 in saplings of drought tolerant Norway maple (Acer platanoides) and drought sensitive European beech (Fagus sylvatica) exposed to moderate drought, either in mono- or in mixed culture. While drought reduced stomatal conductance and photosynthesis rates in both species, both maintained their assimilate transport belowground. Beech even allocated relatively more new assimilates to the roots under moderate drought compared to the non-limited water supply conditions and this pattern was even more pronounced under interspecific competition. Even though maple was a superior competitor compared to beech under non-limited soil water conditions as indicated by the changes in above- and belowground biomass of both species in the interspecific competition treatments, we can state that beech was still able to efficiently allocate new assimilates belowground under combined drought and interspecific competition. This might be seen as a strategy to maintain the root osmotic potential and to assert root functioning. Our results show, thus, that beech tolerates moderate drought stress plus competition without losing its ability to supply belowground tissues. It remains to be explored in future work if this strategy is also valid during long-term drought exposure. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.