Published in

The Royal Society, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2158(469), p. 20130260, 2013

DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2013.0260

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Modelling localized nonlinearities in continuous systems via the method of augmentation by non-smooth basis functions

Journal article published in 2013 by M. R. Brake ORCID, D. J. Segalman
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Existing solutions for continuous systems with localized, non-smooth nonlinearities (such as impacts) focus on exact methods for satisfying the nonlinear constitutive equations. Exact methods often require that the non-smooth nonlinearities be expressed as piecewise-linear functions, which results in a series of mapping equations between each linear regime of the nonlinearities. This necessitates exact transition times between each linear regime of the nonlinearities, significantly increasing computational time, and limits the analysis to only considering a small number of nonlinearities. A new method is proposed in which the exact, nonlinear constitutive equations are satisfied by augmenting the system's primary basis functions with a set of non-smooth basis functions. Two consequences are that precise contact times are not needed, enabling greater computational efficiency than exact methods, and localized nonlinearities are not limited to piecewise-linear functions. Since each nonlinearity requires only a few non-smooth basis functions, this method is easily expanded to handle large numbers of nonlinearities throughout the domain. To illustrate the application of this method, a pinned–pinned beam example is presented. Results demonstrate that this method requires significantly fewer basis functions to achieve convergence, compared with linear and exact methods, and that this method is orders of magnitude faster than exact methods.