Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Wiley, Surface and Interface Analysis, 6-7(42), p. 1311-1315, 2010

DOI: 10.1002/sia.3297

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Comparison of Surface Activation Processes for Protein Immobilization on Plasma Polymerized Acrylic Acid Films

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

In this work, quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) crystal surfaces were analyzed in order to study the behavior of protein attachment on fouling substrates. In this context, covalent and noncovalent immobilization of different proteins [bovine serum albumin (BSA), collagen] has been investigated. For the noncovalent immobilization, silicon dioxide-coated QCM crystals were used, while the covalent immobilization was obtained via plasma-polymerized acrylic acid film (ppAA) deposited onto the QCM substrates. Two different activation processes, namely, reaction with trifluoroacetic anhydride (TFAA) and 1-ethyl-3,3-dimethyl carbodiimide (EDC) and N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS), were studied.After the QCM experiments, all samples were analyzed with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry to gain information on the surface chemistry and composition. The results indicate that the protein adsorption process depends on protein concentration, whereas the complement activation effectiveness depends on protein type. In particular, for BSA, XPS and QCM data show a greater immobilization in the case of EDC/NHS activation compared to the TFAA, whereas in the case of collagen, only the EDC/NHS activation was able to yield covalent coupling. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.