Published in

Wiley, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 1(48), p. 45-57, 2010

DOI: 10.1177/1038411109355376

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Uncovering diverse identities in organisations: AIRing versus auditing approaches to diversity management

Journal article published in 2010 by K. J. Reynolds, R. A. Eggins, S. A. Haslam ORCID
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The topic of diversity is of increasing interest to business, academics, and consultants. Diversity research tends to focus on the demographic characteristics of organisations and examines how managers might work with the ethnic, cultural, religious and gender differences of employees to maximise organisational performance. One strategy is to recognise and record the demographic diversity within the organisation (referred to as auditing) in order to use these diversity resources to strategically advance organisational goals. Based on a social psychological analysis of diversity, though, it is argued that auditing can be highly problematic. This practice can lead to an increase in prejudice and a decrease in performance on relevant organisational dimensions. In contrast, an AIRing (Ascertaining Identity Resources) process is outlined that is more likely to lead to organisational success.