Published in

Elsevier, Atmospheric Environment, 10(45), p. 1849-1857

DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.009

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Source apportionment of ambient particles: Comparison of positive matrix factorization analysis applied to particle size distribution and chemical composition data

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Positive matrix factorization (PMF) method was used to identify the sources of ambient particles (PM10) in Augsburg in winter 2006/07. The analyses were carried out separately with particulate chemical composition (PCC) data at an urban traffic site and with particle size distribution (PSD) data at an urban background site on daily and hourly base, respectively. For PCC data, six factors are identified and associated with NaCl (6.7% of PM10), secondary sulfate (13.0%), biomass burning (13.3%), secondary nitrate (30.5%), traffic emission (16.5%) and re-suspended dust (20.0%). For PSD data, seven factors are identified and are associated with fresh and aged traffic sources, secondary aerosols, stationary combustion, nucleation particles, re-suspended dust and long range transported dust. The two traffic factors were dominated by ultrafine particles (diameter2.5μm. The two different approaches (PCC and PSD data) led to comparable results with strong correlations for secondary nitrate and sulfate/secondary aerosols (r=0.92), which are considered to origin mainly from long range transport. Traffic emissions (r=0.52) and re-suspended dust (r=0.62) showed weaker correlation due to influences of local sources at the different sites.