Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Figure S3

Dataset published in 2008 by Martin Wiesmann, Alumit Ishai
This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.
This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.

Full text: Unavailable

Question mark in circle
Preprint: policy unknown
Question mark in circle
Postprint: policy unknown
Question mark in circle
Published version: policy unknown

Abstract

Study predicts subsequent memory responses. Left: Behavioral data. Paintings to which subjects responded “Yes flower” faster, were subsequently associated with remember memory decisions. The difference between Yes responses for paintings that were later remembered and Yes responses for items that were later known was significant for all paintings (p < 0.001). The differences between Yes responses for paintings that were later remembered and No responses that were later either remembered or known were also significant (p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Longer reaction times to paintings that did not contain flowers resulted later in similar remember and know judgments. Right: Activation in the fusiform gyrus. An event-related analysis revealed that in the FG, “Yes” responses during the flower task subsequently resulted in similar activation during both remember- and know-memory decisions. Stronger activation in the FG elicited by paintings that did not include flowers resulted in subsequent remember judgments, whereas weaker activation elicited by paintings without flowers resulted in subsequent know judgments. The difference between Yes-remember and No-remember, was not statistically significant (p < 0.06).