Published in

American Diabetes Association, Diabetes Care, 5(38), p. 913-920, 2015

DOI: 10.2337/dc14-2605

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Post–Glucose Load Plasma α-Dicarbonyl Concentrations Are Increased in Individuals With Impaired Glucose Metabolism and Type 2 Diabetes: The CODAM Study

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

OBJECTIVE There is increasing evidence that postprandial glucose excursions play an important role in the development of vascular complications. The underlying mechanism is unknown, but glucose-derived formation of reactive α-dicarbonyl compounds may explain why acute hyperglycemia leads to increased risk for diabetes complications. In the current study, we investigated whether α-dicarbonyls are increased after a glucose load in individuals without or with impaired glucose metabolism (IGM) and type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Cross-sectional, linear analyses were performed in the Cohort on Diabetes and Atherosclerosis Maastricht (CODAM [n = 574, 61% men, 60 years old]) study. Individuals with normal glucose metabolism (n = 279), IGM (n = 120), and type 2 diabetes (n = 92) who had complete data on an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and were not on insulin treatment were included in the study population. Plasma α-dicarbonyl (methylglyoxal [MGO], glyoxal [GO], and 3-deoxyglucosone [3-DG]) levels were measured in the fasting state and in samples of the OGTT by ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS The presence of both IGM and type 2 diabetes was significantly associated with higher α-dicarbonyl incremental areas under the curve (iAUCs), as calculated from the OGTT (for IGM, MGO β = 0.190 [95% CI 0.106–0.274], GO β = 0.287 [95% CI 0.172–0.401], and 3-DG β = 0.285 [95% CI 0.221–0.349]; for type 2 diabetes, MGO β = 0.293 [95% CI 0.180–0.405], GO β = 0.536 [95% CI 0.382–0.689], and 3-DG β = 0.542 [95% CI 0.456–0.628]). Adjustment for glucose iAUC attenuated these associations. iAUCs of the α-dicarbonyls correlated highly with glucose iAUC but not with fasting glucose levels or HbA1c. CONCLUSIONS The increased levels of α-dicarbonyls during an OGTT in individuals with IGM and type 2 diabetes underline the potential importance of α-dicarbonyl stress as a candidate to explain the increased risk of diabetes complications in individuals with postprandial hyperglycemia.