Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Elsevier Masson, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, (220), p. 83-89

DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.01.011

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Seasonal photosynthetic response of European beech to severe summer drought: Limitation, recovery and post-drought stimulation

Journal article published in 2016 by Matthias Arend ORCID, Krunoslav Sever, Ellen Pflug, Arthur Gessler, Marcus Schaub
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Trees experience frequent periods of severe drought during their long lives and must therefore be able to recover and compensate for the limitations of previous stresses. In this study, the response of photosynthesis to a severe, long-lasting summer drought and drought release was followed in saplings of a mesic and xeric provenance of European beech transplanted to mesocosms with experimentally controlled water supply. Photosynthesis was assessed in stressed and non-stressed saplings over the course of an entire vegetation season. The drought response was divided into three phases: (1) limitation, (2) recovery and (3) post-drought stimulation. Limitation of photosynthesis developed gradually and caused, in both provenances, a major loss of cumulated photosynthetic activity. It was accompanied by impaired PSII photochemistry indicating severe stress. Recovery started rapidly after re-watering and was fully accomplished within 20 and 10 days in the mesic and xeric provenances, respectively. After recovery, photosynthesis remained at high levels while decreasing in control trees. This post-drought stimulation was sustained until the end of the vegetation period, partly counterbalancing the previous loss of photosynthetic activity. It was attributable to an altered leaf ontogeny as indicated by a delay of autumnal leaf senescence. These observed responses might be important factors when modelling seasonal carbon uptake and phenology of forest ecosystem under future climate change.