Published in

European Geosciences Union, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions, p. 1-24

DOI: 10.5194/amt-2016-9

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

A review of sources of systematic errors and uncertainties in observations and simulations at 183GHz

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Several recent studies have observed biases between measurements in the 183.31GHz water vapour line by space-borne sounders and calculations using radiative transfer models with inputs from either radiosondes (RAOBS) or short range forecasts by Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models. This paper discusses all the relevant categories of observation-based or model-based data, quantification of their uncertainties, and separation of biases that could be common to all causes from those attributable to a particular cause. Reference observations from radiosondes, Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), Differential Absorption Lidar (DIAL) and Raman lidar are thus overviewed. Biases arising from their procedures of calibration, NWP models and data assimilation, instrument biases and radiative transfer models (both the models themselves and the underlying spectroscopy) are presented and discussed. Although no single process in the comparisons seems capable of explaining the observed structure of bias, recommendations are made in order to better understand the causes.