Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Taylor and Francis Group, Grana, 2(49), p. 134-141, 2010

DOI: 10.1080/00173131003617390

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Use of personal sporetraps to complement continuous aerobiological monitoring

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

We analysed pollen and spore data obtained from one continuous and two personal Burkard sporetraps during the spring months of three years (2007-2009). For the statistical analysis, the data was normalised with a log transformation, and then subjected to an ANOVA and a Pearson correlation analysis. The best time to use the personal samplers was determined from 15 years of continuous aerobiological monitoring pollen data to be between 11:00-16:00, when highest concentration was found and in a steady way. Height of sampling was compared at floor level and at 1.1 m with personal samplers; both of them were on a terrace at 6 m above the ground, but no statistically significant differences were found. The results revealed that there were apparently no differences between continuous and personal Burkard samplers for total pollen and spores. Nevertheless, distinguishing the main pollen types (i.e., Poaceae, Quercus, Olea, Cupressaceae, Plantago, and Platanus) revealed that there are some differences for Poaceae pollen only. In conclusion, personal samplers could be used to anticipate continuous monitoring data because their sampling is shorter and the results may be obtained quicker than with a continuous sampler, although they must never be considered as a replacement.