Published in

Oxford University Press (OUP), Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 4(65), p. 811-814

DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkq025

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Comment on: Use of chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing to prevent vascular and epidural catheter colonization and infection: A meta-analysis

Journal article published in 2010 by K. M. Ho ORCID
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Objectives:Vascularandepiduralcatheter-relatedinfectionscausesignificantmorbiditiesandmortalityin hospitalizedpatients.Thismeta-analysisassessedtheeffectofchlorhexidine-impregnateddressingonthe risk of vascular and epidural catheter bacterial colonization and infection. Methods: Literature search was based on MEDLINE (1966 to 1 November 2005), EMBASE and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (2005 issue 3) databases. Only randomized controlled clinical trials comparing chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing with placebo or povidine-iodine dressing were included in this meta-analysis. Two reviewers reviewed and extracted the data independently. Results: Eight studies assessing a single type of chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing were identified and subjected to meta-analysis. The chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing reduced the risk of epidural (3.6% versus 35%, odds ratio (OR) 0.07, 95% CI: 0.02-0.31, P = 0.0005) and intravascular catheter or exit-site bacterial colonization (14.8% versus 26.9%, OR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.34-0.65, P < 0.00001) (overall 14.3% versus 27.2%, OR 0.40, 95% CI: 0.26-0.61; P < 0.0001). The use of chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing was associated with a trend towards reduction in catheter-related bloodstream or CNS infections (2.2% versus 3.8%, OR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.29-1.14, P = 0.11). Local cutaneous reactions to chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing were reported in 5.6% of the patients in three studies (OR 8.17, 95% CI: 1.19-56.14, P = 0.04), and 96% of these reactions occurred in neonatal patients. The number needed to prevent one episode of intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infection was 142 for an average period of catheter in situ of 10 days and a change of dressing every 5 days. The cost of preventing one vascular catheter-related bloodstream infection was estimated to be £298 (US$532.5). Conclusions: Chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing is effective in reducing vascular and epidural catheter bacterialcolonizationandisalsoassociatedwithatrendtowardsreductionincatheter-relatedbloodstream or CNS infections. A large randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm whether chlorhexidine- impregnated dressing is cost-effective in preventing bacterial infection related to vascular and epidural catheters.