Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Wiley, International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 1(5), p. 1-12, 2009

DOI: 10.1002/rcs.230

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Off-pump, minimally invasive and robotic coronary revascularization yield improved outcomes over traditional on-pump CABG

Journal article published in 2009 by Pavan Atluri, Elliott D. Kozin ORCID, William Hiesinger, Y. Joseph Woo
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Coronary artery disease is a global health concern, with increasing morbidity and mortality. Surgical coronary artery bypass grafting has been performed on cardiopulmonary bypass for nearly four decades, with excellent long-term durability. Beating-heart coronary surgery has been increasing in frequency in an attempt to decrease cardiopulmonary bypass-related morbidity. Furthermore, with increasing expertise and technology, minimally invasive and robotic techniques have been developed to enhance post-operative recovery, patient satisfaction and cosmesis. Several clinical trials have demonstrated decreased morbidity and more rapid recovery following off-pump, minimally invasive and robotic procedures when compared to on-pump coronary artery bypass grafts (CABGs). An equivalent extent of revascularization and medium-term anastomotic patency has been demonstrated among all approaches. Furthermore, for a large number of patients who do not have anatomy amenable to traditional coronary revascularization, adjunctive molecular therapies may provide alternative myocardial micro-revascularization.