Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

SAGE Publications, Assessment, 3(24), p. 308-325, 2015

DOI: 10.1177/1073191115606205

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Validity of the Self-Report Psychopathy Scales (SRP-III Full and Short Versions) in a Community Sample

Journal article published in 2015 by Sarah Gordts, Kasia Uzieblo, Craig Neumann ORCID, Eva Van den Bussche, Gina Rossi
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The psychometric properties of the 64-item Hare Self-Report Psychopathy Scale-III (SRP-III) and its abbreviated 28-item SRP-Short Form (SRP-SF; Paulhus, Neumann, & Hare, 2014) seem promising. Still, cross-cultural evidence for its construct validity in heterogeneous community samples remains relatively scarce. Moreover, little is known about the inter-changeability of both instruments. The present study addresses these research gaps by com-paring the SRP-III and SRP-SF factorial construct validity and nomological network in a Bel-gian community sample. The four-factor model of psychopathy was evaluated (N=1510) and the SRP-scales’ relationship with various external correlates (i.e. attachment, bullying and victimization, right-wing attitudes, right-wing authoritarianism and response styles) was ex-amined (n=210). Both SRP versions demonstrated a good fit for the four-factor model, and a considerable overlap with the nomological network of psychopathy. The results suggested that the SRP-SF provides a viable alternative to the SRP-III for assessment in the community. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.