Published in

Taylor & Francis, Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy, 4(12), p. 429-436

DOI: 10.1586/14779072.2014.894885

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Lessons learnt from recent endovascular stroke trials: Finding a way to move forward

Journal article published in 2014 by Mohammed A. Almekhlafi ORCID, Bijoy K. Menon, Mayank Goyal
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The advent of stentrievers provided momentum for endovascular stroke therapy. Hopes were dampened after three randomized trials showed no clear benefit of endovascular therapy. This review discusses the results of these trials results and shortcomings. A detailed discussion will follow on the design, conduct and analysis of current and future endovascular stroke trials. Steps to improve the workflow of acute stroke cases from the time they enter the emergency department until endovascular reperfusion is achieved can significantly shorten the time from onset to successful reperfusion. These factors in addition to using novel approaches to analyze data and minimize delays caused by the consent process are perceived to be sufficient to demonstrate the efficacy of endovascular stroke therapy.