Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Elsevier, Computational Materials Science, (104), p. 108-123, 2015

DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.03.012

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

2D finite element modeling of misorientation dependent anisotropic grain growth in polycrystalline materials: Level set versus multi-phase-field method

Journal article published in 2015 by Yuan Jin, Nathalie Bozzolo, Anthony D. Rollett, Marc Bernacki ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Different full field models exist for the simulation of anisotropic grain growth in polycrystalline structures. In the present work, two full field methods i.e. level set (LS) and multi-phase-field (MPF) methods are implemented into finite element (FE) formulations. The model formulation and simulation results are compared on FE unstructured mesh for the two methods. Relationships between the parameters in both models representing same grain boundary properties are derived. Using equivalent model parameters, both methods can provide similar numerical accuracy in the case of different theoretical test of 2D anisotropic grain growth. In addition, two 2D large scale grain growth simulations are performed with respectively isotropic and anisotropic grain boundary energies by level set method to illustrate the performance of this full field approach.