Published in

SAGE Publications, Global Studies of Childhood, 3(6), p. 268-282, 2016

DOI: 10.1177/2043610615597109

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Babies and big boys: Power, desire and the politics of belonging in early childhood education and care

Journal article published in 2015 by Tina Stratigos ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Belonging is a fundamental human need that impacts young children’s everyday experiences and wellbeing in group care. We know little, however, about how belonging works for infants in multi-age settings such as family day care. In this article, I use Sumsion and Wong’s three intersecting axes of belonging – categorisation, performativity, and resistance and desire – to analyse two segments of video data from a longitudinal case study of belonging for an infant in family day care. I draw on concepts from Deleuze and Guattari, in particular assemblage and desire, to develop understandings of how the axes appeared to be at work and what they meant for the infant’s belonging at family day care. I am particularly interested in what an examination of the axes might reveal about the roles infants can play in the politics of belonging in early childhood education and care. The data illustrate the important role played by material aspects of assemblages, the dynamic nature of social categories and the complex roles of desire and power in the politics of belonging for infants.