Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Oxford University Press (OUP), Endocrinology, 2(141), p. 741-751

DOI: 10.1210/en.141.2.741

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Enhancement of insulin-like growth factor I activity by novel antisera: Potential structure/function interactions

Journal article published in 2000 by Hill Ra, C. E. Stewart ORCID, C. R. Weston, J. M. Pell, H. C. Flick Smith
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) is essential for normal growth and development, regulating cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival. Little IGF-I exists in the free form; rather, it is bound to one of a family of six specific IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs). Usually, IGFBPs have a high affinity for IGF-I and inhibit its activity. Intriguingly, some IGFBPs also potentiate IGF-I action; the precise mechanism of this is unclear, but it is thought to include modification of the IGFBP to lower its affinity for IGF-I. We have previously generated a novel antihuman (h) IGF-I antiserum that, instead of inhibiting IGF-I activity, enhances it in vivo. As the enhancing anti-IGF-I antiserum and potentiating IGFBPs share several properties with regard to IGF action, the antibody may provide a model for examining the actions of enhancing IGFBPs. In this study we demonstrate that the antiserum can also enhance IGF-I activity in vitro, assessed as cell number of a bovine fibroblast cell line, suggesting that its actions might not merely be confined to changing the kinetics of IGF-I clearance or degradation. Epitope scanning using overlapping octamer and hexamer peptides spanning the entire sequence of IGF-I indicates that the enhancing antiserum recognizes a specific linear region spanning the C-terminal region of the C domain and the proximal A domain (residues Ser33 to Cys47), and that this recognition is not present in nonenhancing antisera. Further, this region is located on the opposite surface of IGF-I from putative type 1 receptor-binding residues, allowing the possibility that the antiserum might be able to modulate IGF-I receptor binding. Antibodies raised against a synthetic peptide corresponding to Ser33 to Cys47 of IGF-I also potentiated IGF-I activity in vivo. As IGF-I may be beneficial in various clinical conditions associated with catabolism or cell repair, we suggest that this potentiating anti-IGF-I antiserum has favorable properties that could form a basis for therapeutic strategy.