Published in

American Association for Cancer Research, Cancer Research, 24_Supplement(72), p. P1-13-13-P1-13-13, 2012

DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs12-p1-13-13

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Abstract P1-13-13: First planned efficacy analysis of the NNBC 3-Europe trial: Addition of docetaxel to anthracycline containing adjuvant chemotherapy in high risk node-negative breast cancer patients.

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Background: Risk assessment in node-negative (N0) breast cancer patients (pts) is routinely performed by established clinico-pathological algorithms (CP) (Schmidt et al. Ann Oncol 2009). ASCO guidelines also recommend invasion markers uPA/PAI-1 (UP; Harris et al. JCO 2007). The prospective randomized multicenter NNBC 3-Europe trial had two questions: 1) Does UP compared to the CP algorithm improve identification of low-risk node-negative breast cancer patients? 2) Does addition of taxanes to adjuvant chemotherapy improve DFS probability in high-risk node-negative breast cancer? Data are mature to report on the second question only. Methods: Between 2002 and 2009, 4,147 node-negative breast cancer pts were recruited. Risk assessment was performed by CP (43 %) or by UP (57 %). High-risk pts were randomized to receive FE100C*3-Doc*3 (FEC-D) versus FE100C*6 (FEC) as adjuvant chemotherapy. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival probability (DFS). It was planned to accrue 2,572 pts allowing detection of 4% reduction in recurrence probability at 5 years with a power of 80 % at a level of α=0.05 (LogRank) after a minimum observation time of 2.5 years for every recruited patient. Results: In the intent-to-treat population (ITT, n=2,541), 1,286 high-risk pts received FEC-D, and 1,255 received FEC. In July 2012, 90.8 % of patients had reached the minimum observation time – median follow-up was 43.8, and 44.4 months. Main patients' characteristics were distributed similarly between the two chemotherapy arms: median age was 53 yrs, 37.4 % of pts were premenopausal, median tumor size was 1.90 cm, grade 3 was seen in 53.8 %, hormone receptor status was negative in 30.1 % and HER2 was overexpressed in 20.0 %. Mastectomy was performed in 11 %. All planned courses of FEC-D were given in 84.4 %, of FEC in 91.4 % (p < 0.0001). DFS after 2.5 yrs was for FEC-D 97.5 % (+/− 0.45 %) and for FEC 97.3 % (+/− 0.47 %). Overall-survival probability (OS) after 2.5 yrs was 99.0 % (+/− 0.29 %) for FEC-D and 99.5 % (+/− 0.20 %) for FEC. The survival differences between the two arms were not statistically significant. Per-protocol analysis did not reveal any additional results. Conclusions: Use of taxanes does not further reduce the rate of early recurrences and led to significantly more treatment discontinuation. Today, with adequate adjuvant chemotherapy even high-risk node-negative breast cancer patients have an excellent prognosis. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-13-13.