Published in

Wiley, Human Mutation: Variation, Informatics and Disease, 6(20), p. 452-459, 2002

DOI: 10.1002/humu.10144

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Implementation of SMA carrier testing in genetic laboratories: comparison of two methods for quantifying theSMN1gene

Journal article published in 2002 by Ivon Cuscó ORCID, María J. Barceló, Montserrat Baiget, Eduardo F. Tizzano
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The degeneration and loss of motor neurons of the anterior horn characterize children affected with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Mutations in the survival motor neuron gene (SMN1) are determinant for the development of the disease whereas the number of copies of SMN2, the highly homologous copy of SMN1, plays a role as a phenotypic modifier factor. The detection of SMN1 homozygous deletions is the typical test for SMA diagnosis. Owing to the limitation of this test for carrier and heterozygous deletion analysis, the demand of SMN1 quantitative tests is permanently growing. The high incidence of SMA, the notable carrier frequency, the severity of the disease, and the lack of effective treatment may justify the implementation of such an analysis in DNA diagnostic labs. The advantages and disadvantages of two reliable quantitative methods were evaluated. One of these is a competitive PCR protocol using internal standards and a genomic sequence as a reference. The other method is a real-time PCR employing an external standard as a reference. Both methods present sufficient advantages for incorporation into molecular genetic diagnostic labs. The possibility of studying samples from different labs, the versatility and reproducibility of the analysis, and cost-benefit calculations must be considered in the final choice.