Published in

American Chemical Society, Biochemistry, 13(49), p. 2805-2810, 2010

DOI: 10.1021/bi902039s

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Aggregation Mechanisms of Cystatins: A Comparative Study of Monellin and Oryzacystatin

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
  • Must obtain written permission from Editor
  • Must not violate ACS ethical Guidelines
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
  • Must obtain written permission from Editor
  • Must not violate ACS ethical Guidelines
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Identification of diseases caused by protein misfolding has increased interest in the way proteins adopt non-native conformations and form aggregates. In this study we address the question of how proteins sharing the same fold respond to destabilizing environmental conditions. We have studied the behavior of two members of the cystatin superfamily, MNEI, a single chain monellin, and oryzacystatin_I, a plant cystatin. Despite the close similarity of their three-dimensional architecture, these two proteins aggregate in a different way: MNEI gives rise to amyloid aggregation whereas oryzacystatin_I yields amorphous aggregates. Mutants of oryzacystatin_I, designed to make it more similar to MNEI, generally behave like the parent protein, but a construct devoid of the disordered N- and C-terminal sequences does show a tendency to form amyloid fibers. Our results suggest that precise sequence details may be more important than the three-dimensional architecture in determining the type of aggregate formed. Oryzacystatin_I appears to be a very promising model system for further studies of protein aggregation.