Published in

Cambridge University Press, Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, 03(28), p. 138-140

DOI: 10.1017/s0790966700012118

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Multidisciplinary review to identify patients who could be managed in primary care

Journal article published in 2011 by Vincent Io O. Agyapong, Olorunfemi Ahmodu, Allys Guerandel ORCID
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Published version: archiving restricted
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

AbstractObjectives: Primary care teams have the potential to deliver much of the care currently provided by specialist services. The aim of this review was to determine from patients' clinical records and multidisciplinary team discussions, those that may be suitable for discharge back into primary care.Methods: A retrospective review of the clinical notes of all patients attending a psychiatric outpatient clinic was carried out by all members of the multidisciplinary team to determine the appropriateness of continuing to provide psychiatric services in a specialised psychiatric clinic rather than in a primary care setting, taking into account the patients demographic and clinical variables.Results: It was recommended that 60% of all the patients needed to continue attending the local mental health service, 35.2% could be discharged back into primary care for continuing management whilst the remaining 4.8% could be managed jointly between primary care and the community mental health service. The bulk of the patients recommended for discharge into primary care had a diagnosis of anxiety disorder or depression and all of them had been stable on their treatment for more than six months.Conclusion: Regular multidisciplinary team review has a potential to identify patients who could be discharged back into primary care.