Experimental models of lung fibrosis have been disappointing in predicting therapeutic responses to a wide variety of interventions in clinical fibrosing lung diseases. There are multiple potential reasons, but this fundamentally calls into question the validity of the models and their fidelity to clinical syndromes. We propose that the clinical diseases associated with pulmonary fibrosis, although manifesting a broad array of widely different clinical presentations and features, result in essentially two distinct phenotypes of fibrosis that we will describe. The most common and problematic of these are not effectively modeled experimentally. In this review, we present several clinical entities as examples of the phenotypic distinctions. The first two represent the extremes: postinflammatory fibrosis observed in hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) and dysregulated matrix deposition as observed in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We also present a third clinical entity, that of lung disease associated with rheumatoid arthritis (rheumatoid lung), representing a condition that can manifest as either phenotype, and offering a potential opportunity to explore the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of the two distinct fibrotic phenotypes.