Published in

Wiley, Hydrological Processes, 6(27), p. 896-910, 2012

DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9399

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Unravelling changing sediment sources in a Mediterranean mountain catchment: A Bayesian fingerprinting approach

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

To determine the provenance of Holocene floodplain deposits of the Büğdüz catchment in southwest Turkey, a Bayesian fingerprinting approach was used. An important requirement for any provenance study is that the potential sediment sources show sufficient spatial and compositional heterogeneity. The spatial distribution of potential sources, in this case the various lithologies present within the catchment, was mapped using field observations and ASTER and Quickbird satellite images. To distinguish the source lithologies, a set of geochemical tracers was identified using linear discriminant analysis. This optimum fingerprint was then used in the mixing model to determine the sediment provenance. The Bayesian mixing model uses Markov chain Monte Carlo random walks to determine the most probable source composition and mixing proportions. The uncertainty associated with the input data can be incorporated into the model through prior probability distributions. The spread of the posterior probability distributions represents the uncertainty associated with the mixing proportion calculation. The main contrasts in the provenance of the floodplain deposits reflect the spatial distribution of potential sediment sources throughout the catchment. There are, however, also important temporal variations in sediment provenance and lateral differences due to the nature of floodplain build-up. The observed spatial and temporal variability of sediment provenance gives a first indication that hill slope-channel and within-channel coupling relations are not uniform through the catchment and that different locations showed a distinct response to disturbances.