Published in

Cambridge University Press, Radiocarbon, 1(36), p. 11-26, 1994

DOI: 10.1017/s0033822200014284

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

How smooth should curves be for calibrating radiocarbon ages?

Journal article published in 1994 by Torbjorn E. Tornqvist ORCID, Marc F. P. Bierkens
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

We show that smoothed versions of the high-resolution calibration curve should be used when 14C ages are calibrated with large (> ∼30 14C yr) measurement errors (represented by standard deviation δm) or are mixtures of elements of variable age (natural sample error with standard deviation δn). The degree of smoothing should agree with the standard deviation of total sample error, δt, the square root of the quadratic sum of δm and δn. However, in most cases, δt is not well known, especially due to difficulties in quantifying δn. We present an inverse method that gives a measure of mean δt, for different materials that are widely used in (conventional) 14C dating. Calculations with large (>100) data sets of wood, charcoal, ombrotrophic peat and minerotrophic peat/gyttja samples indicate that δt of such materials is generally much larger than previously assumed, mainly because of large values of δn. This means that particularly in organic deposits, strongly smoothed calibration curves should be used where medium-term 14C variations (wiggles) are completely straightened. This has especially major consequences for calibrating 14C histograms for natural 14C variations. We conclude that 14C histograms consisting of samples of organic deposits do not require correction for medium-term 14C variations and that uncalibrated 14C histograms need not be as suspect as is usually believed.