Published in

Elsevier, EuPA Open Proteomics, (8), p. 6-15, 2015

DOI: 10.1016/j.euprot.2015.06.001

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Inter-laboratory Evaluation of Instrument Platforms and Experimental Workflows for Quantitative Accuracy and Reproducibility Assessment

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The reproducibility of plasma protein quantitation between laboratories and between instrument types was examined in a large-scale international study involving 16 laboratories and 19 LC–MS/MS platforms, using two kits designed to evaluate instrument performance and one kit designed to evaluate the entire bottom-up workflow. There was little effect of instrument type on the quality of the results, demonstrating the robustness of LC/MRM-MS with isotopically labeled standards. Technician skill was a factor, as errors in sample preparation and sub-optimal LC–MS performance were evident. This highlights Please cite this article in press as: A.J. Percy, et al., Inter-laboratory evaluation of instrument platforms and experimental workflows for quantitative accuracy and reproducibility assessment, EuPA Open Proteomics (2015), http://dx.