Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

American Society of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 8(28), p. 1322-1328, 2010

DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.25.0803

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Comparison of the Prognostic Value of Assessing Tumor Diameter Versus Tumor Volume at Diagnosis or in Response to Initial Chemotherapy in Rhabdomyosarcoma

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Purpose In this study on a series of 205 patients with rhabdomyosarcoma, we investigated whether the prognostic effect of tumor size, at diagnosis or in terms of tumor response after induction chemotherapy, differed when tumor diameter or tumor volume were considered. Patients and Methods Tumor size was assessed radiologically at diagnosis and, for the 108 patients with measurable disease, after three courses of chemotherapy. The analysis was based on multivariable models (linear for association between size and patient/tumor characteristics, Cox for association with survival). The predictive performance of the Cox model (estimated by V measure) was compared for the tumor's diameter and volume. Results Initial tumor size was significantly larger in male or older patients and in T2 or alveolar tumors, but was not associated with the achievement of complete surgical resection. Initial tumor size significantly influenced overall survival. The risk of death was comparable for tumors 10 cm in maximum diameter and 194.0 cm3 in volume. The predictive performance of the Cox model was much the same when the tumor's diameter or volume was considered. Tumor response was a significant predictor of survival, again irrespective of the type of tumor measurement considered. Conclusion In our analysis, initial tumor size and tumor response were significant prognostic factors in rhabdomyosarcoma, regardless of whether tumor diameter or volume was considered. Three-dimensional tumor assessment was of no greater prognostic value than one-dimensional assessment, neither initially nor after induction treatment.