Published in

Wiley, Medicinal Research Reviews, 1(24), p. 13-39, 2003

DOI: 10.1002/med.10054

Wiley-VCH Verlag, ChemInform, 14(35), 2004

DOI: 10.1002/chin.200414278

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Clinical Significance of Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor (uPAR) Expression in Cancer

Journal article published in 2003 by Charles Edo de Bock ORCID, Yao Wang
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The involvement of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) system in particular has been extensively studied in the pathogenesis of cancer. The molecular role of the uPA receptor (uPAR) is well characterized with its participation in cell migration and extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation. Over-expression of uPAR in cancer has been demonstrated in many studies and is considered an attractive target for anticancer agents. We and others have down-regulated uPAR expression in an attempt to inhibit cancer metastasis based on its molecular role. Uniquely, uPAR which is a glycosyl phosphatidylinositol anchored protein is not only bound to the cell surface but also has a soluble form, suPAR. There is now accumulated clinical and experimental evidence supporting the significant role of uPAR and its soluble counterpart in a number of solid cancers. The expression of uPAR can be associated with tumor cells or stromal cells or both. Differences observed in the expression of uPAR using immunohistochemistry (IHC) are likely explained by the use of different antibodies and techniques rather than true cellular differences and are reviewed here. This review summarizes the clinical relevance of uPAR and its soluble form in the prognosis and diagnosis of different cancers.