Published in

Elsevier, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1(37), p. 183-186

DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.06.008

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

A method to assess whether ‘preferential use’ occurs after 15N ammonium addition; implication for the 15N isotope dilution technique

Journal article published in 2005 by Anke Herrmann, Ernst Witter, Thomas Kätterer ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The robustness of the assumption of equilibrium between native and added N during N-15 isotope dilution has recently been questioned by Watson et al. (Soil Biol Biochem 32 (2000) 2019-2030). We re-analyzed their raw data using equations that consider the added and native NH4+ and NO3- pools as separate state variables. Gross mineralization rates and first-order rate constants for NH4+ and NO3- consumption were obtained by combining analytical integration of the differential equations with a non-linear fitting procedure. The first-order rate constants for NH4+ consumption and NO3- immobilization for the added NH4+ and NO3- pool were used to estimate gross mineralization rates and first-order rate constants for nitrification of native NH4+. The latter were 2-4 times lower than the first-order rate constants derived from the added N pool. This discrepancy between first-order rate constants for nitrification implies that one or more process rates estimated for the added N pools cannot be applied to the native N pools. Preferential use of the added N resulted in an overestimation of the gross mineralization by 1.5-2.5-fold, emphasizing the need for critical evaluation of the assumption of equilibrium before gross mineralization rates are calculated. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.