Anchor damage due to tourist visitation is becoming increasingly intense in the Abrolhos Marine National Park, Brazil, and is probably detrimental to the biota associated with the seagrass beds. In this study the effects of anchor damage on an algal dominated seagrass (Halodule wrightii) bed in the national park were measured and assessed. The mean size of anchor scars was 0.16 m2, and it was estimated that 0.5% of the seagrass beds were damaged per year by boat anchoring. The short term effect of simulated anchor damage (over 4 d) was a reduction in seagrass density, in the standing stock of Laurencia obtusa (Hudson) Lamouroux growing epiphytically on Udotea flabellum (Ellis and Solander) Lamouroux, and in the total macrophyte (seagrass + algae) standing stock. The longer-term (5, 9 and 13 month) ability of the seagrass and macroalgae to recover from damage, and possible seasonal differences in recovery ability, were determined. H. wrightii reoccupied experimentally cleared 0.25 m2 areas by vegetative elongation, and in 9 mo short shoot, rhizome and root biomass, and short shoot and rhizome densities were similar to controls. The ability of the seagrass to recover appeared not to be seasonal, and seasonality was only found in short shoot density. Recovering seagrass sent up more short shoots per length of rhizome than plants in undamaged areas. The most abundant macroalga was the rhizophytic Udotea flabellum; other algae grew on it as epiphytes or unattached. U. flabellum could recover quickly from simulated anchor damage, though other common algae (Dictyota mertensii (Martius) Kuetz., D. cervicornis Kützing, Padina spp. and Laurencia obtusa) showed more complex patterns of recovery that were seasonally or species dependent. A perturbation such as an anchoring has an effect on the algal flora more than a year later, although most algae species and H. wrightii can recover more quickly. Notably large areas devoid of macrophytes within the seagrass bed may have been created by the fusion of anchor scars.