Published in

American Geophysical Union, Journal of Geophysical Research, A6(112), p. n/a-n/a, 2007

DOI: 10.1029/2006ja012196

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Identifying the radiation belt source region by data assimilation

Journal article published in 2007 by J. Koller, Y. Chen, G. D. Reeves ORCID, R. H. W. Friedel, T. E. Cayton, J. A. Vrugt
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Published version: archiving restricted
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

1] We describe how assimilation of radiation belt data with a simple radial diffusion code can be used to identify and adjust for unknown physics in the model. We study the dropout and the following enhancement of relativistic electrons during a moderate storm on 25 October 2002. We introduce a technique that uses an ensemble Kalman filter and the probability distribution of the forecast ensemble to identify if the model is drifting away from the observations and to find inconsistencies between model forecast and observations. We use the method to pinpoint the time periods and locations where most of the disagreement occurs and how much the Kalman filter has to adjust the model state to match the observations. Although the model does not contain explicit source or loss terms, the Kalman filter algorithm can implicitly add very localized sources or losses in order to reduce the discrepancy between model and observations. We use this technique with multisatellite observations to determine when simple radial diffusion is inconsistent with the observed phase space densities indicating where additional source (acceleration) or loss (precipitation) processes must be active. We find that the outer boundary estimated by the ensemble Kalman filter is consistent with negative phase space density gradients in the outer electron radiation belt. We also identify specific regions in the radiation belts (L* % 5–6 and to a minor extend also L* % 4) where simple radial diffusion fails to adequately capture the variability of the observations, suggesting local acceleration/loss mechanisms.