Published in

Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Mediterranean Marine Science, 2(11), p. 225, 2010

DOI: 10.12681/mms.74

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Competition between static gear of the small-scale fisheries in Algarve waters (southern Portugal)

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Parallel fishing trials with 0.30 mm diameter monofilament gill nets and longlines using small hooks were carried out in the Algarve (southern Portugal) over a one-year period, 1997-1998, with the objective of comparing species composition, catch rates, discards and size ranges. Four hook sizes of MUSTAD brand, round bent, flatted sea hooks (numbers 15, 13, 12 and 11) and four mesh sizes of 50, 60, 70, and 80 (stretched mesh) (nominal bar length) of gill nets were used in the trials. Over-all, 84 species were caught, with gill nets taking 71 species and longlines 54 species and with 41 species caught by both gear types. The amount of discarding was higher for gill nets than for long-lines. The catch species composition differed between the two gear types, with the commercially valu-able sea breams dominating the longline catches whereas small pelagics were relatively more impor-tant in the gill nets. Multivariate analysis showed a clear separation between the different sizes of the two gear types both in terms of numbers and weights per species. Algarve gill netters and longliners fish the same species assemblage on the same fishing grounds, but have clearly different impacts in terms of catch species composition, catch rates and sizes. This information will be useful for the improved management of these small-scale, multi-species, multi-gear fisheries, where different gear types compete for scarce resources. In particular this study provides a basis for a more rational allo-cation of licenses and control of fishing effort.