Published in

Elsevier, Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy, 4(19), p. 275-279, 2014

DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2013.05.005

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Is stereotactic ablative radiotherapy an alternative to surgery in operable stage I non-small cell lung cancer ?

Journal article published in 2013 by Andrea Riccardo Filippi ORCID, Pierfrancesco Franco ORCID, Umberto Ricardi ORCID
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Surgery is the gold therapeutic standard for patients affected with stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy is currently considered the preferred treatment option for inoperable patients, representing approximately 25%. Limited data are available directly comparing surgery and SABR in operable patients, none of them prospective. Preliminary results are encouraging, showing that the two treatment modalities are equally effective in terms of tumour control, with expected similar survival projections. Moreover, in elderly patients SABR could represent a valid treatment alternative in comparison to surgery due to the lower morbidity. We here review and discuss the potential role of SABR as an alternative to surgery in operable early stage lung cancer patients.