Published in

American Association of Physics Teachers, American Journal of Physics, 9(64), p. 1125

DOI: 10.1119/1.18393

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Criticism of Feynman's analysis of the ratchet as an engine

Journal article published in 1970 by Juan M. R. Parrondo ORCID, Pep Español
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Published version: archiving restricted
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The well-known discussion on an engine consisting of a ratchet and a pawl in [R.P. Feynman, R.B. Leighton, and M. Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, vol. 1 (Addison Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1963), pp. 46.1-46.9] is shown to contain some misguided aspects: since the engine is simultaneously in contact with reservoirs at different temperatures, it can never work in a reversible way. As a consequence, the engine can never achieve the efficiency of a Carnot cycle, not even in the limit of zero power (infinitely slow motion), in contradiction with the conclusion reached in the Lectures. 1 Introduction Chapter 46 of The Feynman Lectures on Physics [1] contains a celebrated illustration of the impossibility of obtaining work from thermal fluctuations with an efficiency greater than that of a Carnot cycle. A careful analysis of a device that, at first sight, seems to lift a weight using the thermal energy of a gas, reveals that there exists in fact a dissipation which preve...