Published in

Wiley, Journal of Geophysical Research. Space Physics, 6(118), p. 3557-3567, 2013

DOI: 10.1002/jgra.50174

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Can a nightside geomagnetic Delta H observed at the equator manifest a penetration electric field?

Journal article published in 2013 by Y. Wei, M. Fraenz, E. Dubinin ORCID, M. He, Z. Ren, B. Zhao, J. Liu, W. Wan, K. Yumoto, S. Watari, S. Alex
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

A prompt penetration electric field (PPEF) usually manifests itself in the form of an equatorial ionospheric electric field being in correlation with a solar wind electric field. Due to the strong Cowling conductivity, a PPEF on the dayside can be inferred from Delta H (ΔH), which is the difference in the magnitudes of the horizontal (H) component between a magnetometer at the magnetic equator and one off the equator. This paper aims to investigate the performance of ΔH in response to a PPEF on the nightside, where the Cowling conductivity is not significant. We first examine the strongest geomagnetically active time during the 20 November 2003 superstorm when the Dst drops to −473 nT and show that the nightside ΔH can indeed manifest a PPEF but with local time dependence and longitude dependence. We then examine a moderately active time by taking advantage of the multiple‐penetration event during 11–16 November 2003 when the Dst remains greater than −60 nT. During this event, a series of PPEF pulses recorded in Peru, Japan, and India form a database, allowing us to examine PPEF effects at different local times and longitudes. The results show that (1) the nightside ΔH was caused by attenuation of the effects of the polar electric field with decreasing latitude; (2) the nightside ΔH can manifest a PPEF at least in the midnight‐dawn sector (0000–0500 LT), but not always; and (3) the magnitude of the nightside ΔH in the midnight‐dawn sector in Peru is on average only 1/18 of that of the dayside ΔH in response to a given PPEF.