Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

American Public Health Association, American Journal of Public Health, S1(95), p. S20-S27, 2005

DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2004.050963

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Legislating “Sound Science”: The Role of the Tobacco Industry

Journal article published in 2005 by Annamaria Baba, Daniel M. Cook, Thomas O. McGarity, Lisa A. Bero ORCID
Distributing this paper is prohibited by the publisher
Distributing this paper is prohibited by the publisher

Full text: Unavailable

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

In the late 1990s, in an effort to dispute the link between secondhand smoke and lung cancer, Philip Morris initiated a campaign to legislate “sound science.” The campaign involved enacting data access and data quality laws to obtain previously confidential research data in order to reanalyze it based on industry-generated data quality standards. Philip Morris worked with other corporate interests to form coalitions and workgroups, develop a “data integrity” outreach program, sponsor symposia on “research integrity,” and draft language for the new acts. The tobacco industry played a role in establishing laws that increase corporate influence on public health and regulatory policy decisions.