Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Elsevier, Animal Behaviour, 3(61), p. 661-669, 2001

DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1621

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Fluctuating asymmetry, mating success, body size and heterozygosity in Coenagrion scitulum (Rambur) (Odonata: Coenagrionidae)

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

For decades fluctuatingasymmetry (FA) has been considered a good descriptor of developmental stability. Correlations have been shown between FA and several fitness components, including matingsuccess and heterozygosity level. However, some doubts have been expressed about the generalization of these results, perhaps because of bias towards positive results and a poor critical approach in the first phase of FA studies. Studies on Odonata are scarce and are concentrated on the Coenagrionidae family, with contrasting results in the relationships between FA and matingsuccess, size and other fitness components. We investigated the relationships between FA expressed as right−left wing length (R−L), bodysize expressed as (R+L)/2, multilocus and single locus heterozygosity assessed by allozyme electrophoresis and short-term matingsuccess (SMS) assessed from the status (mated or not) of the males at the moment of collection. We collected 260 males from a breeding population. The data were analysed by both univariate and multifactorial statistical methods. After excluding a correlation between FA and bodysize, we checked the presence of a true FA by using tests for normality, directional asymmetry, antisymmetry and difference from the interindividual variations. The results showed no correlation between FA (either signed or absolute) and heterozygosity, bodysize and SMS, while heterozygosity was clearly positively correlated with bodysize and with SMS. Our data suggest an effect of the presence of some particular alleles on SMS, instead of an effect of the multilocus heterozygosity, even if the presence of only three polymorphic loci weakens the conclusions. Finally, no correlation was found between bodysize and SMS.