Published in

American Chemical Society, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 46(103), p. 9336-9344, 1999

DOI: 10.1021/jp992244f

American Chemical Society, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 40(117), p. 10569-10569, 2013

DOI: 10.1021/jp409104y

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Correction to “Enthalpies of Formation of N-Substituted Pyrazoles and Imidazoles”

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
  • Must obtain written permission from Editor
  • Must not violate ACS ethical Guidelines
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
  • Must obtain written permission from Editor
  • Must not violate ACS ethical Guidelines
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Accurate experimental enthalpies of formation measured using static bomb combustion calorimetry, the "vacuum sublimation" drop calorimetry method, and the Knudsen-effusion method are reported for the first time for four azoles: 1-methylimidazole (1MeIMI), 1-methylpyrazole (1MePYR), 1-benzylimidazole (1BnIMI), and 1-benzylpyrazole (1BnPYR). These values and those corresponding to imidazole (1HIMI), pyrazole (1HPYR), 1-ethylimidazole (1EtIMI), 1-ethylpyrazole (1EtPYR), 1-phenylimidazole (1PhIMI), and 1-phenylpyrazole (1PhPYR) are compared with theoretical values using the G2(MP2) and the B3LYP/ 6-311*G(3df,2p)//6-31G(d) approaches. In general, there is a very good agreement between calculated and experimental values for the series of N-substituted imidazoles, while the agreement is less good for the series of the N-substituted pyrazoles. Experimentally, the gap between the enthalpies of formation of imidazoles and pyrazoles decreases significantly upon N-substitution, while the theoretical estimates indicate that this decrease is smaller.