Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob)

DOI: 10.1109/biorob.2012.6290857

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Comparative analysis of integrated diaphragmatic electromyography during three different modalities of mechanical ventilation (NAVA, PSV and PCV)

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Interaction between ventilator and patient's breathing control represents a challenging field of research. The present study presents the comparison among varying level of assistance under three different modalities of mechanical ventilation (i.e., NAVA, PSV and PCV) on a group of fifteen patients with prolonged weaning. Integrated effort of (i) diaphragmatic electromyography and (ii) inspiratory/expiratory time delays under the three modalities were computed. Integrated effort of inspiratory time delay was lower under NAVA compared to PSV and PCV at less comfortable level of assistance. Integrated effort of expiratory time delay was lower under NAVA compared to PCV and lower under PSV compared to NAVA, both at most and less comfortable level of assistance. Our findings showed better patient-ventilator interaction under assisted ventilator support modes, especially under NAVA, compared to PCV.