Published in

Frontiers Media, Transplant International, 4(19), p. 310-318, 2006

DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2006.00277.x

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Sirolimus and FK778: A comparison of two anti-proliferative immunosuppressants for prevention of experimental obliterative airway disease

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

This study examined the efficacies of sirolimus and the novel immunosuppressive agent FK778 to prevent obliterative airway disease (OAD). Tracheae from Brown-Norway donors were heterotopically transplanted in the greater omentum of Lewis rats. Recipients were treated for 28 days with sirolimus (0.5 or 2 mg/kg), FK778 (5 or 20 mg/kg), or combination regimens (0.5 + 5 mg/kg, 2 + 20 mg/kg). Tracheal segments were evaluated for degree of luminal obliteration, percentage of luminal epithelial cell coverage, and peritracheal infiltration. In vitro smooth muscle cell (SMC) proliferation and migration assays were performed to assess direct nonimmune-related effects of the drugs. Sirolimus 2 mg/kg and FK778 20 mg/kg effectively reduced graft infiltration and prevented airway obliteration, whereas FK778 5 mg/kg was insufficient. Sirolimus 0.5 mg/kg at least showed moderate inhibitory effects on luminal obliteration and graft infiltration. Combination regimens revealed no significant beneficial effects. Both sirolimus and FK778 barely showed preserved epithelial coverage. Within the range of relevant concentrations, FK778 showed more potent anti-proliferative and anti-migratory effects on SMC in vitro than sirolimus. Both agents proved effective to prevent OAD development without preserving relevant amounts of epithelium. The anti-proliferative potency on SMCs seems to be an especially important mechanism for FK778. De novo combination regimens revealed no beneficial interaction and thus remain doubtful.