Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Elsevier, American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 4(60), p. 629-640, 2012

DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.01.028

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Immune Monitoring of Kidney Allografts

Journal article published in 2012 by Julie Ho, Chris Wiebe ORCID, Ian W. Gibson ORCID, David N. Rush, Peter W. Nickerson
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Current strategies for posttransplant monitoring of kidney transplants consist of measuring serial serum creatinine levels, clinical follow-up, and in some programs, protocol biopsies. These strategies may be insufficient to predict acute rejection in kidney transplants, which remains the major factor affecting long-term transplant outcomes. Immune monitoring may conceptually be divided into strategies for detecting humoral rejection (eg, donor-specific antibody) or cellular rejection. Cellular rejection markers may be separated further into those related to cytotoxic T lymphocytes (granzyme A/B, perforin, Fas ligand, and serpin B9), regulatory T cells (FOXP3), and CD4 T cells (the chemokines CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, CCL2, and fractalkine, as well as TIM-3). Finally, transcriptomic changes and renal tubular injury markers also may be useful for detecting early inflammatory changes post-kidney transplant. Ultimately, novel strategies for monitoring the immune status of the kidney transplant may lead to early therapeutic intervention and improved kidney transplant outcomes.