Published in

Karger Publishers, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 6(63), p. 305-311, 2011

DOI: 10.1159/000327027

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

The Phonatory Deviation Diagram: A Novel Objective Measurement of Vocal Function

Journal article published in 2011 by Glaucya Madazio, Sylvia Leão, Mara Behlau ORCID
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

<i>Aim:</i> To identify the discriminative characteristics of the phonatory deviation diagram (PDD) in rough, breathy and tense voices. <i>Methods:</i> One hundred and ninety-six samples of normal and dysphonic voices from adults were submitted to perceptual auditory evaluation, focusing on the predominant vocal quality and the degree of deviation. Acoustic analysis was performed with the VoxMetria (CTS Informatica). <i>Results:</i> Significant differences were observed between the dysphonic and normal groups (p < 0.001), and also between the breathy and rough samples (p = 0.044) and the breathy and tense samples (p < 0.001). All normal voices were positioned in the inferior left quadrant, 45% of the rough voices in the inferior right quadrant, 52.6% of the breathy voices in the superior right quadrant and 54.3% of the tense voices in the inferior left quadrant of the PDD. In the inferior left quadrant, 93.8% of voices with no deviation were located and 72.7% of voices with mild deviation; voices with moderate deviation were distributed in the inferior and superior right quadrants, the latter ones containing the most deviant voices and 80% of voices with severe deviation. <i>Conclusion:</i> The PDD was able to discriminate normal from dysphonic voices, and the distribution was related to the type and degree of voice alteration.