Published in

Elsevier, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2(36), p. 71-81, 2011

DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.11.001

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Students’ attributions for their best and worst marks: Do they relate to achievement?

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Research has found a relation between motivation and attributions for success and failure. However, few studies have clarified the relationship of attributions to school achievement and possible cultural differences in this relationship. To investigate this issue, 5333 secondary students (European, Asian, Maori, Pacific) rated four common attributions – ability, effort, task difficulty, and luck – and three social influences (teachers, peers, and family) for their best and worst marks. Motivation orientations were also measured. Several measures were significantly related to students’ GPA scores, most notably the motivation orientations Doing My Best and Doing Just Enough, but also attributions to effort, teacher, and peer influences. There were substantial differences for ethnicity, particularly between European students and Maori and Pacific students. The results support theories claiming that effort attributions motivate achievement but also support the benefits of a self-serving bias.Research highlights► Motivation and attributions predict 48% of the variance in students’ GPA scores. ► Ethnic group differences in attributions are significant. ► Attributing success to effort and failure to the teacher predicts higher GPA scores. ► Attributing success to luck and failure to family and friends predicts lower GPA.