Published in

Wiley, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4(35), p. 718-731, 2005

DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02143.x

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Punitive reactions to completed crimes versus accidentally uncompleted crimes

Journal article published in 2005 by Margit E. Oswald, Ulrich Orth ORCID, Marianne Aeberhard, Eliane Schneider
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that the harm caused by crime affects punitive reactions even if differences in the degree of harm are merely accidental. However, it remains unclear whether the effect is direct or whether it is mediated by attributed responsibility or blame. Participants were 303 university students who listened to 4 case vignettes (between-subjects design). Half received information about a completed crime and half about an accidentally uncompleted crime. Crime type was either fraud or rape. The results suggest that individuals consider the actual harm to a significantly greater extent than attribution theory would predict. Moreover, the link between harm and punishment was virtually not mediated by attributed blame and not moderated by individual differences in morality. Future studies should investigate whether the harm-punishment link is a result of an automatic act of retaliation or a desire to compensate for the harm done to the victim (restorative justice).