Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Stockholm University Press, Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 4(53), p. 462, 2001

DOI: 10.3402/tellusb.v53i4.16619

Stockholm University Press, Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 4(53), p. 462-478, 2001

DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0889.2001.d01-32.x

Stockholm University Press, Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 4(53), p. 462-478, 2001

DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0889.2001.530410.x

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Effects of air masses and synoptic weather on aerosol formation in the continental boundary layer

Journal article published in 2001 by Ed D. Nilsson ORCID, J. Paatero, M. Boy ORCID
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Nucleation of near nm sized aerosol particles and subsequent growth to ∼100 nm in 1–2 days has in recent years been frequently observed in the continental boundary layer at several European locations. In 1998–99, this was the focus of the BIOFOR experiment in Hyytil in the boreal Finnish forest. Nucleation occurred in arctic and to some extent in polar air masses, with a preference for maritime air in transition to continental air masses, and never in sub-tropical air. The air masses originated north of the BIOFOR experiment by paths from the southwest to northeast sector. The nucleation was also associated with cold air advection behind cold fronts, never warm air advection. This may relate to low pre-existing aerosol concentration, low cloudiness and large diurnal amplitudes in the continental boundary layer associated with cold air advection and clear skies. Arctic and polar air together with cold air advection did not always lead to nucleation. The most important limiting meteorological factors were cold front passages and high cloudiness, probably through reduced photochemistry and wet scavenging of precursor gases and new aerosol particles. The preference for nucleation to occur in arctic air masses, which seldom form in the summer, suggests a meteorological explanation for the annual cycle of nucleation, which has a minimum in summer. The connection to cold-air outbreaks suggests that the maximum in nucleation events during spring and autumn may be explained by the larger latitudinal temperature gradients and higher cyclone activity at that time of the year. Nucleation was observed on the same days over large parts (1000-km distance) of the same air mass. This suggests that the aerosol nucleation spans from the microphysical scale to the synoptic scale, perhaps connected through boundary layer and mesoscale processes.