Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Springer (part of Springer Nature), Brazilian Journal of Physics, 4(44), p. 308-314

DOI: 10.1007/s13538-014-0208-8

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

The Non-Adiabatic Polaron Model Revisited

Journal article published in 2014 by Fabian E. N. Ramirez, José Antonio Souza ORCID
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

We revisit Holstein's polaron model to derive an extension of the expression for the thermal dependence of the electrical resistivity in the non-adiabatic small-polaron regime. Our analysis relaxes Holstein's assumption that the vibrational-mode energies are much smaller than the thermal energy k (B) T and substitutes a fifth-order expansion in powers of for the linear approximation in the expression for the quasiparticle hopping probability in the original treatment. The resulting expression for the electrical resistivity has the form rho(T)=rho (0) T (3/2) exp(E (a) /k (B) T-C/T (3)+D/T (5)), where C and D are constants related to the molecule-electron interaction energy, or alternatively to the polaron binding energy, and the dispersion relation of the vibrational normal modes. We show that experimental data for the La (1-x) Ca (x) MnO (3) (x=0.30,0.34,0.40, and 0.45) manganite system, which are poorly fitted by the conventional non-adiabatic model, are remarkably well described by the more accurate expression. Our results suggest that, under conditions favoring high resistivity, the higher-order terms associated with the constants C and D in the above expression should taken into account in comparisons between theoretical and experimental results for the temperature-dependent transport properties of transition-metal oxides.