Published in

Inter Research, Marine Ecology Progress Series, (159), p. 97-103

DOI: 10.3354/meps159097

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Coastal and deep-sea benthic diversities compared. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 159: 97-103

Journal article published in 1997 by Js Gray, Ki Ugland, Rs Wilson, Poore Gcb, F. Olsgard, Ø. Johannessen
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Published version: archiving restricted
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Most generalisations about marine benthic diversity (species richness) are derived from few studies, few samples and low species numbers. It is questionable whether the data on which most paradigms, especially about the deep sea, are based truly represent general patterns of marine diversity. Available information from deep-sea studies are summarised and compared with some extensive data sets from the shallow coasts of Norway and Australia. We show that species richness per unit area is as high, if not higher in shallow sedimentary habitats as was reported for the deep-sea data by Grassle & Maciolek (1992; Am Nat 139:313-341). Apparent high diversity in the deep sea may be explained, in part, by the vast area of this environment. All surveys in both the deep-sea and coastal habitats are shown to traverse a variety of microhabitats and thus sediment heterogeneity is not an explanation for the high species richness in coastal environments.