Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Taylor and Francis Group, Ringing and Migration, 1(10), p. 31-34

DOI: 10.1080/03078698.1989.9676004

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Habitat and sampling related bias in sex-ratio of trapped BlackcapsSylvia atricapilla

Journal article published in 1989 by Marc Herremans ORCID
Distributing this paper is prohibited by the publisher
Distributing this paper is prohibited by the publisher

Full text: Unavailable

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Herremans, M. 1987. Habitat and sampling related bias in sex-ratio of trapped Blackcaps Sylvia atricapilla. Ring. & Migr. Migr. 10: 31–34.Random sampling at a coastal site showed sex-ratios rather close to, but in some years significantly different from equality. Trapping of Blackcaps by artificially induced landfall using tape lures revealed an overall sex-ratio bias in favour of males (61. 5%, N=5,067). However, results were greatly variable, depending on habitat conditions and selectivity of sampling.Trapping in habitat suitable for the species resulted in relatively more females (54.7% males) than sampling in “unsuitable habitat” (66.2% males) and, similarly, “random sampling” resulted in more females (55.5% males) than samples “selected” by tape-luring birds down from higher vegetation (64.6% males). However, random sampling in suitable habitat (53.4% males, N=8.382) also proved distinct from random sampling in unsuitable habitat (65.0% males, N=1,864), indicating that females are less likely to come down into, or remain in, strange habitats. In both cases a clear habitat assessment at night seems involved in the birds decision.