Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Nihon Genshiryoku Gakkai, Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, sup3(39), p. 251-254

DOI: 10.1080/00223131.2002.10875455

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Solubilization of α-FeO(OH), ThO2.2H2O and γ-UO3 by hydroxamate and carboxylate Hgands

This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.
This paper was not found in any repository; the policy of its publisher is unknown or unclear.

Full text: Unavailable

White circle
Preprint: policy unclear
White circle
Postprint: policy unclear
Question mark in circle
Published version: policy unknown
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The ability of five different ligands to solubilize α-FeO(OH) (goethite), ThO2.2H2O and γ-UO3 was investigated at pH 3, 5 and 7: the hydroxamates acetohydroxamate (AHA), glutarodihydroxamate (GDA), rhodotorulate (RA), desferoxamine B (DFO) and the dicarboxylate iminodiacetate (IDA). Solubilization in the absence of ligand and solubilization by DFO (pH 5) as a function of time was also investigated. RA was the most effective at solubilizing α-FeO(OH) at all three pH values and ThO2.2H2O at pH 5 and 7. IDA solubilized most ThO2.2H2O at pH 3. GDA was the least effective ligand for α-FeO(OH) and ThO2.2H2O. Most γ-UO3 was solubilized by DFO (pH 3 and 5) and GDA (pH 7). AHA was the least effective. For dissolution over time, solubilization of α-FeO(OH) appears to be a diffusion-controlled process, whilst for ThO2.2H2O and γ-UO3 it is controlled by first-order chemical kinetics.